Anonymous Whistleblower Leads to Arrest of Pedophile Gary Burnore

[Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>]

eridani@databasix.com (Belinda Bryan) wrote:

> >>  Criminal
> >>bullies can no longer count on intimidation to silence those who
> >>know of their crimes and wish to see justice done without exposing
> >>themselves and their families to revenge and retaliation.
> 
> The "anonymous whistleblower" in this case is a figment of the Anonymous
> Asshole's imagination.  

What else would you call a person who Gary Burnore ADMITS sent an
anonyous e-mail to his victim's mother, warning her of Gary's
activities BEFORE his subsequent arrest for those activities.  (The
date of his arrest was provided by Gary himself.)  If it's a figment
of anyone's imagination, it's Gary's, because he's the one who dared
to complain publicly that this warning consitituted "harassment".

So where's the figment?  Did Gary lie when he claimed that someone
sent such an anonymous warning?  Did he lie when gave a date for his
arrest that was AFTER his public complaint about this e-mail?

> In fact, it's something he's completely fabricated.  I've offered to bet
> him $5000 that I can prove him wrong about it, but he's too much of a
> chickenshit to take the bet.  
> 
> BECAUSE HE WOULD LOSE.  
> 
> Because there was no "anonymous benefactor", no "anonymous whistleblower".
> The police report--which is a matter of public record--proves it.  As does
> the court documents--also a matter of public record.
> 
> So I can make a $5000 bet in complete confidence that I won't
> lose.   

Quit bluffing.  If you have such proof, produce it.  Gary promised
to a year ago and never did.

Why not contribute your $5,000 to Rachael's college fund and get off
your denial kick?

How could a police report "prove" that there was no anonymous
whistleblower, BTW?  Gary's own usenet post in 2/97 proves there
*WAS* a person who anonymously tipped off the victim's mother to the
molestation, unless you're now saying that Gary was lying back then.
Gary, of course, claimed that this was "harassment".  If the charges
had been false, then Gary would have been correct.  But history
proves otherwise.  Gary was convicted of exactly what the tipster
warned about.  That makes him/her a whistleblower in my book.
What's a police report going to say to contradict that?

> And on this note, Ed and everyone else, can we just drop it?  Throwing
> facts and logical arguments at these idiots is a complete waste of time.

Why should they "just drop it" when you and Gary keep replying to
this thread?  If you want people to drop it, then take your own
advice and drop it yourselves.  But you couldn't resist one more
smear against Ron, could you?