[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
- To: cypherpunks@toad.com
- From: DOOM Anonymous Untraceable User <nobody@seclab.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 07:15:02 +0100 (CET)
- Comments: This message did NOT originate from the Sender address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.The message sender's identity is unknown and virtually not replyable.The cryptographic technology used for anonymizing messages providesTOTAL anonymity, that is, there is NO WAY of tracing back the senderof the message. Please check http://anon.efga.org/~rlist orhttp://www.publius.net for more information about the MIX technology.Please report problems to <abuse@seclab.com>.
- Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Hi,
Can anybody shed light on the patent restrictions of the RSA public
key algorithm? According to the RSA FAQ,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA is patented under U.S. Patent 4,405,829, issued September 29, 1983 and
held by RSA Data Security, Inc.; the patent expires 17 years after issue, in the
year 2000. RSA Data Security has a standard, royalty-based licensing policy,
which can be modified for special circumstances. The U.S. government can
use RSA without a license because it was invented at MIT with partial
government funding.
In the U.S., a license is needed to "make, use or sell" RSA. However, RSA
Data Security usually allows free non-commercial use of RSA, with written
permission, for academic or university research purposes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does this mean that a commercial organization outside the US can use a
RSA implementation without legal hassles from RSADSI, or is there some
sort of licensing scheme for organizations outside the US? The BSAFE
toolkit from RSA is really expensive, and a nice alternative to that
is RSAeuro which is freely available as source code. Any suggestions?