Re: Spammer's evolution... WAS sick and fucking tired of this Y2k shit

[Sunder <sunder@brainlink.com>]

Jean-Francois Avon wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:53:22 -0500  Sunder said:
> >archive! They're certainly evolving... ugh...
> 
> Don't you find this absolutely fascinating from the
> standpoint of evolution?

Strange, isn't it!
 
> It is very close to what happens in the biological world
> too.  Maybe there is some lessons to be applied from a
> cross-study of epidemiology, evolutive micro-biology, and
> net spammers...

Now if only we could figure out how to make it increasingly more and more
difficult for them to want to spam.  The whole marketing, demographics, spam,
spam, spam, in your face ads 24/7 mentality sickens me.  It's an eyesore in
the least.  I wouldn't be surprised if some study found that working in the
advertising professions causes brain cancer, male pattern baldness, penis
shrinkage, frigidity, and bad manners. :)  Or rather I wish it would.  Sigh...
 
> We definitely live in an intellectually stimulating era!

Yes, even the annoying idiots are getting smarter and more annoying in their
own way. Ugh.

-- 
---------------------------- Kaos Keraunos Kybernetos -------------------- 
 + ^ +  Sunder              "The real aim of current policy is to     /|\ 
  \|/   sunder@brainlink.com ensure the continued effectiveness of   /\|/\ 
<--*--> ALLOW FREE EXPORT    OF US information warfare assets against\/|\/ 
  /|\   STRONG CRYPTOGRAPHY! individuals,businesses and governments   \|/ 
 + v +  PROTEST WASSENAAR!!! in Europe and elsewhere" -- Ross Anderson 
---------------------------- http://www.sunder.net -----------------------
RESTRICTED DATA - This material contains RESTRICTED DATA as defined in 
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. Unauthorized disclosure subject to 
administrative and criminal sanctions. NOFORN ORCON WNINTEL SIOP-ESI CNWDI