[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
- To: cypherpunks@toad.com
- From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 04:15:26 +0100
- Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.Please report problems or inappropriate use to theremailer administrator at <abuse@replay.com>.
- Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Secret Service aided
license photo database
February 18, 1999
Web posted at: 2:29 p.m. EST (1929 GMT)
In this story:
Anti-terrorism technology
'Why were state officials not
told?'
RELATED STORIES, SITES
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- While
a plan to build a national database
of driver's license photographs is
being opposed in some states on
privacy grounds, the U.S. Secret Service provided money
and technical assistance to help the New Hampshire
company at the center of the controversy.
Nashua-based Image Data LLC, which has bought millions
of driver's license photos, confirmed a story that appeared
Thursday in the Washington Post.
The company said nearly all of the $1.46 million in federal
aid it received was used for its database project and a
small portion was used by the Secret Service to pay travel
and other expenses.
Image Data is trying to build an anti- fraud database to help
prevent check and credit card fraud that costs retailers an
estimated $25 billion a year.
Anti-terrorism technology
But congressional leaders who helped arrange federal
assistance for the project also envisioned using the photo
file to combat terrorism, immigration abuses and other
identity crimes, according to the Post.
The newspaper quotes a letter from eight members of
Congress in September 1997 thanking Sen. Ben Nighthorse
Campbell, R-Colorado, "for including $1.46 million for a
pilot program to combat identity-based crimes."
The money, part of the fiscal 1998 federal budget, went to
Image Data LLC, which has been testing its "TrueID"
system to confirm a customer's identity with a driver's
license photograph when a credit card or personal check is
used.
The letter said Image Data's "TrueID technology has
widespread potential to reduce crime in the credit and
checking fields, in airports to reduce the chances of
terrorism and in immigration and naturalization to verify
proper identity."
It also said "the Secret
Service can provide technical
assistance and assess the
effectiveness of this
technology." Among the
lawmakers signing the letter
were two New Hampshire
Republicans, Sen. Judd Gregg
and Rep. Charles Bass, and
Sen. Ernest Hollings, D-South
Carolina.
Secret Service agent Cary Rosoff told the Post that while
the agency did not seek to be included in the project, it saw
a chance to help Image Data improve its technology.
'Why were state officials not told?'
Public outrage mounted in at least three states after it was
revealed that Image Data had contracted to buy drivers'
photo images in South Carolina, Florida and Colorado.
Last week, a South Carolina judge rejected that state's
attempt to have the pictures returned. A Florida judge
blocked a similar Image Data deal there, and Colorado's
governor wants to do the same.
In South Carolina, where the state legislature originally
approved the deal, 3.5 million driver's license photos were
sold to Image Data for $5,000 to test "TrueID."
The state, citing privacy concerns raised by the public, then
sued the company to get out of the contract.
South Carolina Attorney General Charles Condon said
Thursday that states should have been told that the Secret
Service had a hand in the project and was considering law
enforcement uses for the technology.
He called for an investigation into why Image Data didn't
tell state officials about the federal interest in the database.
"We now find out that this out-of-state operation was really
busy getting nearly a million-and-a-half-dollar grant from
the Secret Service to develop technology for anti-terrorist
techniques and to discover immigration violations,"
Condon said in a statement. "Why were state officials not
told?"
Image Data on Thursday denied that it misled states about
how it intended to use the photographs.
"The facts are that Image Data use of information is
governed by both law and by contract," said a company
statement. "We sign contracts with states to limit our use of
the information only for fraud prevention."
http://www.cnn.com/US/9902/18/license.photos/