[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The mole known as "Fockler, Curtis J."



On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 10:11:30 -0500, Sunder wrote:

>Apparently this is one clueless rat fucker.  He sent a blank reply to one of
>my messages quoting it entirely and adding NO text, then when I asked what he
>wanted, he sent another no text reply.  I'm adding this pointy haired moron 
to
>my ignore filters. :)
>
>He's most certainly not the brightest bulb in the drawer...  I really wish 
the
>TLA's would at least hire people with a clue to monitor these lists rather
>than desk jokey morons who think the internet is something like an interstate
>highway. Ugh!


I was wondering!  I had one of thoses a few days ago, ran a trace on his IP 
and surely, ended up at the government. He's even too clueless to forge his 
headers!

Now, today, I got four of them!

I am wondering what he/they are trying to do...  

FUD is certainly one.  I even wrote a very nice letter to him notifying him 
that he forgot to include his reply, supposing that he was genuinely replying 
to me!

Or he's can't make the difference between the  "archive and file and catalog 
suspicious individuals" button and the "reply" button.

Or maybe he's a "good guy"(tm) and he wants to "notify" me that I'm under the 
enquiring eye of uncle Sam's goons?  Who knows?  Very romantic, isn't it?

I did not cross the USA border since years, way before I publicly argued that 
Jim Bell's scheme was, technically, unstoppable and that humanly, very 
unlikely to never develop.  It was and still is my opinion that the genie is 
out of the bottle.  I am wondering if I shouldn't try to go shopping in 
Plattsburg, NY, for an afternoon just to see if I'm since then persona non-
grata...

Ciao

jfa