[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ISN] Are Pentagon computers compromised? (fwd)

To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [ISN] Are Pentagon computers compromised? (fwd)
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 04:35:26 +0100
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.Please report problems or inappropriate use to theremailer administrator at <abuse@replay.com>.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9902232235420.32536-100000@zor.hut.fi>
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com

>>>>> jei  <jei@zor.hut.fi> writes:

  > The version [Curry] tested and knows to be secure is 
  > Windows NT 3.5 ...

ROTFL!

This is obviously a *different* NT 3.5 than the notably insecure
OS of the same name that was released to the general public...

-- PenguinMonger

References:
- [ISN] Are Pentagon computers compromised? (fwd)
  - From: jei@zor.hut.fi

Prev by Date: Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock II USMC/Ret dead
Next by Date: Re: The mole known as "Fockler, Curtis J."
Prev by thread: [ISN] Are Pentagon computers compromised? (fwd)
Next by thread: Pentium III serial number is soft switchable after all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread