Re: static nat

[William.Stackpole@predictive.com]

    [ Part 1, Text/PLAIN  44 lines. ]
    [ Unable to print this part. ]


To date, there aren't any known vulnerabilities to the Exchange-SMTP
gateway.  That does not however, mitigate the other obvious problems with
mail based attacked including using Exchange as a spam relay, active
content attacks (ala ILOVEYOU), HTTP formatted mail attacks, virus
infected attachments, flooding the server, DoS attacks, etc.  Keep the
big picture.  

Bill Stackpole, CISSP
 



"Yaniv Fine" <yanivf@know-net.com>
Sent by: firewalls-owner@Lists.GNAC.NET

07/13/00 08:48 AM
Please respond to yanivf
       
        To:        "Firewalls LIST \(E-mail\)" <firewalls@Lists.GNAC.NET>
        cc:        
        Subject:        static nat

Hi all

We are using check point FW-1 and thinking of installing Exchange server
with Static Nat
What are the risks  we are taking in  this scenario    .
Should I thinks on a tighter security strategy but more expensive
Any pointers are welcome


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yaniv Fine
MIS Manager
Know-Net Group
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@lists.gnac.net with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]