[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Load Balancing / Gauntlet Question
[ Part 1, Text/PLAIN (charset: Unknown "windows-1252") 48 lines. ]
[ Unable to print this part. ]
[ The following text is in the "windows-1252" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Have a look at www.stonesoft.com or www.stonebeat.com They has a
software solution that requires you to have two firewalls side by
side. If you purchased Gauntlet on a per node basis instead of a per
server basis, then your only extra cost will be the StoneSoft
licensing fees plus the extra hardware for the second firewall.
Michael Nowacki, CISSP
- -----Original Message-----
From: Andy Beer [mailto:abeer@lind-waldock.com]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 4:16 PM
To: 'Firewalls@Lists.GNAC.NET'
Subject: Load Balancing / Gauntlet Question
Hello everyone,
I currently use Gauntlet 5.0 on Solaris. I am looking for a high
availability load balancing solution. I am considering the Radware
Fireproof product. Has anyone tried using routing protocols? Does
anyone have any opinions on what would be a good mix? Whether it be
hardware or software? Thanks in advance for all answers.
Andrew Beer
Lind-Waldock & Co.
1030 W. Van Buren
Chicago, IL 60607
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
WARNING: All E-Mail sent to or from this user address will be
accepted by the Lind-Waldock corporate E-Mail system and is subject
to archival and review by someone other than the recipient.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.3
Comment: Internet Commerce Solutions Inc.
iQA/AwUBORbODa0Unx3HNXmCEQLn/gCgt/hbpCzKDPcPtppq5QqbaJPxO6MAn0At
e0QhJyuh+Ohu1LUfnWEK4Osa
=2O7L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|