[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FW1] pptp security assesment?

To: CheckPoint_Mailing_List <fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [FW1] pptp security assesment?
From: Philipp Buehler <lists@fips.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 16:00:04 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20000320090607.B15156@bauchan.Wyldwood.COM>; "Franklin R. Jones" on 20.03.2000 @ 17:06:07 MET
Mail-Followup-To: CheckPoint_Mailing_List <fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com>
References: <20000320090607.B15156@bauchan.Wyldwood.COM>
Reply-To: Philipp Buehler <lists@fips.de>
Sender: owner-fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com


Franklin R. Jones wrote To CheckPoint_Mailing_List:
> 
> Has anyone done or know of a "impartial" security assessment of MS use
> and implementation of the pptp protocol? any feedback appreciated.

http://www.counterpane.com/pptp.html

ciao
-- 
Philipp Buehler, aka fIpS | BOfH | NUCH | double-p on IRC
When the horse dies, get off.
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [FW1] pptp security assesment?
  - From: Sam Samalin <ssamalin@ionet.net>

References:
- [FW1] pptp security assesment?
  - From: "Franklin R. Jones" <grat@Wyldwood.COM>
- [FW1] pptp security assesment?
  - From: "Franklin R. Jones" <grat@Wyldwood.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: [FW1] Accept ICMP vs. Accept "Last"
Next by Date: Re: [FW1] pptp security assesment?
Prev by thread: [FW1] pptp security assesment?
Next by thread: Re: [FW1] pptp security assesment?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread