[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [FW1] ssh access - Can be free!!!!



    [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. Some ]
    [ characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]


Check out the following.

http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html#ssh


Totally free ssh.

James Conner


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Judson Main [SMTP:judson@btg.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 09, 1999 5:29 PM
> To:	Paquette, Trevor
> Cc:	'Lance Spitzner'; Ivan Fox; fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com
> Subject:	Re: [FW1] ssh access
> 
> 
> I would take strong objection to its being the future of SSH.
> Their pricing is outrageous for ssh servers.  To secure a small
> shop would cost at least $10,000 in software.  Remember,
> the price of $500 applies per individual server.  Either you're
> going to turn telnet off everywhere, or not.  If you turn it off
> everywhere, then you have to pay a steep price.
> 
> A lump sump corporate license would be a better solution.
> Most tech folks would have a hard time convincing their
> managers to spend $500 per server for a different kind of
> telnet (mine immediate manager understands, but his don't -
> and there's no way in hell I could every get a PO through!)
> 
> .02
> 
> Jud.
> 
> "Paquette, Trevor" wrote:
> 
> > Actually SSH version 1.X is not free for commercial use either.
> >
> > I talked DIRECTLY to DataFellows regarding SSH 1.0
> > about this. If SSH 1.0 is used in any manner, shape or form in a
> > commercial environment, then it must be licensed. (whether it
> > directly or indirectly generates revenue.)
> >
> > According to DataFellows, the license was written by Finnish
> > lawyers, in their language and was translated into English. The
> > translation lost some of it's original meaning. Because of this,
> > they have been reluctant to enforce the license.
> >
> > SSH2 is technically superior to SSH1, and is the future of SSH.
> > It is faster and even has sftp. I for one, have told our senior
> > folks that with SSH2 I can lock down the servers even more. And
> > at a dollar cost of (approx) $500, less then 2 dollars per day
> > in a year, I (and they) can sleep better.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Lance Spitzner [SMTP:lance@ksni.net]
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 07, 1999 8:42 PM
> > > To:   Ivan Fox
> > > Cc:   fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com
> > > Subject:      Re: [FW1] ssh access
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 7 Nov 1999, Ivan Fox wrote:
> > >
> > > > We are thinking to use SSH, but have no experience with it or Unix
> at
> > > all.
> > >
> > > Alot of people have been asking me about ssh and how to use it in
> > > a firewalled environment.  I may have a topic for my next whitepaper
> :)
> > > To be dead honest, I'm still learning about ssh every day, it has
> > > many powerful options.
> > >
> > > > Am I correct to say that there is no SSH for Microsoft NT?
> > >
> > > I believe there are several options for sever based ssh on NT,
> > > however I have never used any.  I know for a fact there are many
> > > client based ssh options for Windows and NT, I'm personally a big
> > > fan of SecureCRT from http://www.vandyke.com
> > >
> > > > However, I can setup a UNIX server so that users can "ssh" to it and
> > > then to
> > > > NT and/or other UNIX servers?
> > >
> > > That is definitely an option, you would be building a ssh proxy.
> > > This adds an addtional layer of security as you have central point
> > > of inboud traffic, and can log who is accessing what.
> > >
> > > > What if the NT servers are in DMZ, would users use the SSH server as
> a
> > > > spring board to other servers?
> > >
> > > Once again, that is an option with your ssh proxy server.  It really
> > > depends on your network, what traffic is going where, and your
> security
> > > policy.
> > >
> > > > With implementation of SSH, I can limit users just using FTP, but
> not
> > > > TELNET, through OS?!
> > >
> > > I'm a little confused by this question.  ssh can be used as an
> encrypted
> > > replacement for telnet.  It also has scp, which is an encrypted method
> > > of copying files.
> > >
> > > For more info on ssh, download the source and check out the docs.  You
> > > can find ssh at http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/packages/security/ssh/
> > >
> > > I recommend version 1.2.27.  Version 2.x and above has licensing
> issues
> > > (ie, not free).
> > >
> > > Lance
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ==========================================================================
> > > ======
> > >      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the
> instructions at
> > >                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> > >
> ==========================================================================
> > > ======
> >
> >
> ==========================================================================
> ======
> >      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
> at
> >                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
> ==========================================================================
> ======
> 
> 
> 
> ==========================================================================
> ======
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ==========================================================================
> ======


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================