[FW1] Is CVP reliable ?

["Eismann, Marc" <meismann@GCS.de>]

    [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. Some ]
    [ characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]


Hello all

Currently I´m looking for a virusscanner which 
acts directly on the internet gateway.
>From the two possible solutions (CVP or Proxy)
I would prefer CVP.
But now have heard from many sites
"Don´t use CVP. It is unreliable and makes
problems reporting a status."

In my test-environment CVP works nice (much bettern
than the proxy solution).


So what is your "real-life" experience with CVP?
What software / solution is your favorite one ?

Any comments would be appreciated.


Marc Eismann

GCS mbH
Industriestraße 23
40822 Mettmann

Telefon: 02104-9106-0
FAX : 02104-9106-40
EMail: mailto:meismann@gcs.de
Internet: http://www.gcs.de


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================