Re: [FW1] Solaris processes x security

[Nancy Velie <nvelie@sportsline.com>]

Dear "Techlists",

Lance's white paper is an excellent writeup, and give you a secure
configuration w/a minimum of fuss.

You can even go more conservative than this, if you wish, and install
only the "core distribution".  You will have to add a few packages, if
you do this, however.  Email me if you're interested, and I'll discuss
it w/you offline.

-N

Lance Spitzner wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Techlists wrote:
> 
> > Which processes (and or packages) a Solaris 2.6 box running Firewall-1 V.
> > 4.0 should not have running on for security reasons ? I am doing a research
> > on this and would like to know if any of you know good sites or links where
> > I could find that information.
> 
> Try "Armoring Solaris"
> http://www.enteract.com/~lspitz/armoring.htmlm
> 
> Lance Spitzner
> http://www.enteract.com/~lspitz/papers.html
> 
> ================================================================================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================