[FW1] RE: Looking for TCP based VPN (FIN)

[Frank Knobbe <FKnobbe@Home.com>]

    [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. Some ]
    [ characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike (and Bill),

you probably set up the NAT to do static one-on-one translation,
correct? I have not been able to bring PPTP through a firewall
(Tested FW-1) with hiding NAT, using a single NAT'ed IP for multiple
LAN IP's.

Others,

thanks for the infos. I'll check them out. The Nortel Appliance
(formerly New Oak) does PPTP, L2F, L2TP and IPSec. After re-reading
the RFC for L2TP is appears that it runs over UDP, which means
reliability might be a question, but it would pass a proxy. However,
I don't want to carry a huge switch together with my laptop when I
travel to and on client site ;)

The PowerVPN from Axent (formerly AltaVista Tunnel?) seems to run on
TCP (Thanks Ron!). I'll give my Axent guy a call tomorrow.

Thanks again,
Frank


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Espinola, Mike [mailto:Mike.Espinola@EastmanSoftware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 11:48 AM
> To: 'Frank Knobbe'
> Subject: RE: Looking for TCP based VPN
> 
> Gee, I use MS PPTP through my NAT'd Firewall-1 firewall all 
> the time.  The
> TCP port is 1723, IP port 47.
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.1
Comment: PGP or S/MIME (X.509) encrypted email preferred

iQA/AwUBN9Wi4URKym0LjhFcEQJYXgCcDTv5qfuY3Csf+1RKDkDkRsQ2D4gAnjLr
XmbgRAYfLciDkyEb02ejhr8p
=+zpY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================