IDS: Re: implications of recent legal trends

[Stuart Staniford-Chen <stuart@SiliconDefense.com>]

Archive: http://msgs.securepoint.com/ids
FAQ: http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html
IDS: http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html
HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner@uow.edu.au
NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce.
SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list.
UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo@uow.edu.au
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Mila, Brian D" wrote:

> 
> The article failed to mention that the reason for the lawsuit was because
> Cyber Patrol was copyrighted
> with express limitations against decompilation and reverse-engineering,
> which is what was used to
> expose the secret list of blocked sites from the Cyber Patrol program.
> However, this doesn't apply
> to fragrouter, whisker, etc., that only supply input which the program
> wasn't designed to handle.
> Subtle difference? Perhaps.  But one that the lawyers are quick to point
> out.  The real meat of the
> story (not mentioned in that article) was that the author of cphack had
> GPL'ed it, so legally can
> Mattel claim the rights to it? I believe this is why the ACLU got involved
> in the first place.

Thanks to all for the clarifications.  Now I have the bigger picture, it
does seem less worrying.

Stuart.

-- 
Stuart Staniford-Chen --- President --- Silicon Defense
                   stuart@silicondefense.com
(707) 822-4588                     (707) 826-7571 (FAX)